Legal Opinion

Parker v. Barefield

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 2006No. 06-0201PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal we consider how to preserve error when a trial court sustains special exceptions and then dismisses the case without first allowing the plaintiff the opportunity to amend its pleadings. The court of appeals affirmed the dismissal, concluding that the plaintiffs had waiyed the error by failing to assert their right to replead in a motion for new trial. 202 S.W.3d 211, 213. We disagree that a motion for new trial was needed to preserve error here because the plaintiffs had already asserted their right to replead and had, in fact, amended their pleadings before the trial court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Friesenhahn v. RyanTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Inglish v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
  3. Howell v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Lubbock, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Parker v. Barefield, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2006

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Dr. Saung Zin Park v. Escalera Ranch Owners' Association, Inc. and Rostrata Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  2. Wilson N. Jones Memorial Hospital v. Ammons, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  3. Gallien v. Washington Mutual Home Loans, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
  4. Cadle Co. v. Jenkins, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  5. Adrienne Gallien and Joseph Gallien v. Washington Mutual Home Loans, Inc. Fleet Mortgage Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API