Legal Opinion

Howell v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Lubbock, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1980No. B-9343PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERROR

2Per curiam

We refuse the writ of error in this case, no reversible error, but we disapprove that part of the opinion which holds that Rule 324, Tex.R.Civ.P., required the plaintiff in a non-jury action to file a motion for new trial as a predicate to preserve the alleged error. 595 S.W.2d 208.

The trial court dismissed Reverend Rodney Howell’s suit after sustaining a special exception which stated that the action was barred by limitations. Plaintiff’s fourth amended petition had dropped the defendant that had been sued in the first three petitions and named a new and…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Howell v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Lubbock, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Brock v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

4Cited by26 opinions

  1. Litton Industrial Products, Inc. v. GammageTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Aero Energy, Inc. v. Circle C Drilling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Palmer v. Enserch Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Dougherty v. GiffordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Pierson v. SMS Financial II, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API