Legal Opinion
State v. Riley
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided August 10, 2005No. 2004AP2321-CRPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, PJ.
¶ 1. The issue presented in this case is whether the circuit court properly granted Deonte D. Riley's motion to suppress electronic surveillance evidence consisting of recordings of the outgoing telephone calls Riley placed from the Fond du Lac County jail. The Wisconsin Electronic Surveillance Control Law (WESCL), Wis. Stat. §§ 968.27-968.37 (2003-04), 1 expressly prohibits interceptions of both wire and oral communications absent a court order authorizing or approving such interceptions, with some exceptions. The State asserts that the monitoring and recording of Riley's…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey Howard VAN POYCK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Angelo Amen, Mark A. Deleonardis, Michael Paradiso and Oreste Abbamonte, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Richard Willoughby, Quintin Prioleau, Arthur Prioleau, and Carleton MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- United States v. FootmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. Howard Hawk WillisTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- Banargent v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
- Preston v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- State v. GillilandSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- State v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.