Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard Willoughby, Quintin Prioleau, Arthur Prioleau, and Carleton Montgomery

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 6, 1988No. 1295, 1285-1287, Dockets 88-1067 to 88-1070PublishedCited by 130 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEARSE, Circuit Judge:

Defendants Richard Willoughby, Quintín Prioleau (“Quintín”), Arthur Prioleau (“Arthur”), and Carleton Montgomery appeal from judgments entered after a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York before Morris E. Lasker, Judge, convicting them of conspiracy to obstruct justice, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (1982), in connection with an impending trial of Quintín, Arthur, and Montgomery for armed robbery; and convicting Quintín of witness tampering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(b)(2)(D) (1982 & Supp. IV 1986). Arthur and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by130 opinions

  1. Gerald Griggs-Ryan v. Beulah Smith, Gerald Griggs-Ryan v. Richard ConnellyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. Herrera v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. United States v. Sewn NewtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  4. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey Howard VAN POYCK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API