Legal Opinion
State v. Anderson
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 3, 1972No. 71-650PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.
The most important issue presented by this case concerns the voir dire examination of prospective jurors as to their scruples regarding the infliction of capital punishment upon the defendant. The trial court itself conducted this part of the examination, stating to the veniremen :
“Let me now, then, turn to this matter of your eligibility to serve as a jury in this case, which is the trial of a person charged with a capital offense. No one is eligible to serve on the jury who would not be able to render in a proper case a verdict which the facts and the law would require.
“The indictment in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- McGautha v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Boulden v. HolmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Maxwell v. BishopSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. HiggsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. LozaOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. DurrOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. BeukeOhio Supreme Court · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.