State v. Durr

In his fourteen prop*89ositions of law, the defendant-appellant asserts various errors by the trial and appellate courts. This court has previously decided many of these legal questions, and they will therefore be disposed of accordingly. State v. Poindexter (1988), 36 Ohio St. 3d 1, 520 N.E. 2d 568, syllabus.

After thoroughly reviewing each of appellant’s propositions of law, we find none that has merit, and for the reasons stated below we uphold the appellant’s convictions and sentence of death.

A

As his first proposition of law, the appellant argues that the trial court unreasonably and…