Legal Opinion

State v. Beuke

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1988No. 86-642PublishedCited by 157 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

The defendant-appellant asserts various errors by the trial and appellate courts in twenty propositions of law. Many of these legal issues have been decided in prior cases and will be disposed of accordingly. State v. Poindexter (1988), 36 Ohio St. 3d 1, 520 N.E. 2d 568, syllabus.

Beuke’s first fourteen propositions of law allege errors occurring at the penalty phase of his trial. Propositions of law fifteen through twenty allege errors occurring at the guilt phase of the proceedings. For the reasons set forth below, we overrule the propositions of law and affirm the convictions and sentence…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by157 opinions

  1. State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. GarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002

152 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API