Legal Opinion

Kral v. Boesch

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 24, 1996No. C9-96-1226PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

Respondent Alan Krai commenced this declaratory action against appellant Ralph Boesch asserting (1) that he was entitled to a prescriptive easement to drain surface water through drainage tile on the neighboring Boesch property, (2) that Boesch was obliged to restore the tile line, (3) that he was entitled to enjoin Boesch from future interference with the tile system, and (4) that Boesch be held liable for tile line repair and Krai’s crop loss. Following a March 1, 1996 trial, the district court ordered judgment on findings of fact and conclusions of law denying Krai’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Enderson v. KelehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Duenow v. LindemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Sachs v. ChiatSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. Pell v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  5. Miles v. City of OakdaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goerke Family Partnership, Donald Shelstad v. Lac qui Parle-Yellow Bank Watershed District, William CroattCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  2. City of Plymouth v. Hildania KristensenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  3. Kral v. BoeschCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Victor Legatt v. Dennis LegattCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API