Duevel v. Jennissen
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
Duevel and Jennissens are adjoining landowners. Duevel brought an action to recover damages and to enjoin Jennissens from pumping water onto his land. Jennis-sens counterclaimed for damages caused by Duevel’s obstructing a drainage ditch connecting the parties’ lands. The trial court dismissed Duevel’s suit, ordered him to reopen and keep open the ditch, and awarded Jennissens damages for flooding caused by Duevel’s obstruction of the ditch. On appeal Duevel contends that the trial court’s findings of fact are clearly erroneous. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Edmund Duevel owns…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Enderson v. KelehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Pell v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Miles v. City of OakdaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
3Cited by5 opinions
- Evers v. WillabyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Kral v. BoeschCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Quist v. KroeningCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Kral v. BoeschCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Victor Legatt v. Dennis LegattCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015