Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Marvin
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge. *
On appeal from summary judgment for respondent, appellant argues that the district court erred in finding respondent an occupant of a vehicle insured by appellant for the purposes of underinsured motorist coverage. Appellant further argues that the district court erred in finding that respondent’s injuries arose out of the maintenance and use of the insured vehicle as a vehicle. Because we conclude that the district court did not err in finding that respondent was entitled to recover under-insured motorist benefits, we affirm.
FACTS
Respondent Mariese Marvin 1 was…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Continental Western Insurance Co. v. KlugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Sauter Ex Rel. Benson v. SauterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Tlougan v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Nygaard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fjelstad v. State Farm InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Great West Cas. Co. v. DeckerDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
- Great West Casualty Company v. DeckerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
- United Services Automobile Association v. Bruce A. EstepCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2023