Legal Opinion
People v. Crane
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 19, 1906No. Crim. No. 47PublishedCited by 3 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, P. J.
The information herein filed against the appellant charges him with having willfully and feloniously uttered and passed to Charles E. Noyes a certain false, forged and counterfeit check as the true and genuine check of the purported maker thereof, knowing the same to be false, forged and counterfeit, with the intent to defraud the said Noyes, “which said check is in the words and figures as follows, -to wit:
“Central Bank. Savings and Commercial.
“No. 90.
“Oakland, Cal., June 3rd, 1905.
“Pay to Arthur Crane or bearer $18 eighteen dollars.
“(signed) D. J. HALL,
“Trustee Hutchinson Estate.”
—and which…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
- Cross v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
- People v. TerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Sutton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
- People v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bullard v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1960
- Cook v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1921
- People v. AllanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927