Clark v. Beyrle
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County. S. E. Crow, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The controversy in this action is over the right of the plaintiffs to receive payment of certain demands out of moneys due from the city of Santa Barbara to Robert Beyrle for work done in the construction of a tunnel.
The city of Santa Barbara undertook to construct a water conduit tunnel running in a northerly and southerly direction through the Santa Ynez Mountains for a length of some nineteen thousand feet. Contracts for the construction of the northerly 8,560 feet of the tunnel were entered into between the said city and Beyrle. For the purpose of doing the work this part of the tunnel…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bates v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Kellogg v. HowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Hampton v. ChristensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Stimson Mill Company v. BraunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- McCormick v. Los Angeles City Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1870
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Theisen v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Roystone Co. v. DarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Fuller v. TowneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Primo Team, Inc. v. Blake Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.