Legal Opinion

West v. Searle & Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 18, 1991No. 90-49PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Appellants, Gari and Larry West, filed a products liability suit against appellees, Searle & Co., G.D. Searle & Co., and Searle Pharmaceuticals, Inc. In their complaint the Wests pleaded that Gari’s use of Ovulen-28, a birth control medication, caused her to develop a hepatic adenoma, or a benign liver tumor, which eventually ruptured and caused a life’ threatening situation. The complaint next recites by conclusory, not factual, allegations, or issue pleadings, that the oral contraceptive was defectively designed and manufactured; that the appellee drug companies…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Reyes v. Wyeth LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. Collins v. Eli Lilly & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  5. MacDonald v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Michael R. DANCY, Appellant, v. HYSTER COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. Gourdine v. CrewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. Haase v. StarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Vitanza v. Upjohn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  5. Shirley Bell v. PfizerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API