Pitney-Bowes, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
BeckwoRth, Judge:
The merchandise involved in this case consists of electrically operated rapid embossing machines for plates, model 790, sometimes referred to as model 90. They were imported from West Germany on November 3,1964, and were assessed with duty at 15 per centum ad valorem under item 674.35, Tariff Schedules of the United States, as metal-working machine tools. It is claimed that the machines are not machine tools but are properly dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem under item 676.30, as office machines, not specially provided for, or free of duty under item 676.05, as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Snow's United States Sample Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. Davies Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
- Heide v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- International Forwarding Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
- Davies v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- W. R. Filbin & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Hollywood Accessories, Division of Allen Electronics & Equip. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- General Methods Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- M. Hohner Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.