Mattel, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
' Maletz, Judge:
This case involves the proper tariff classification of wigs for dolls that were imported from Japan in 1964. They were classified by the government under item 737.20 of the tariff schedules providing for “dolls, and parts of dolls including doll clothing,” and assessed with duty at the rate of 35 percent. Plaintiff protests this assessment and claims that the merchandise is properly classifiable under the provision for “wigs” in item 790.70, and thus dutiable at only 14 percent.
The provisions of the tariff schedules with which we are concerned read as follows:
General Headnotes…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- F. L. Smidth & Company v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Hironimus v. DurantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- W. R. Filbin & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Ross Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- Mattel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- S.G.B. Steel Scaffolding & Shoring Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
- Stella D'Oro Biscuit Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
- Mattel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
- Commonwealth Oil Refining Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- 1-2 Kangaroo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.