Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Foe», Judge:
The importations involved in this protest consist of merchandise invoiced as a “Twin Amarilla Pump” and described as a rotary displacement magma pump, together with rotors and other parts for such a pump. The merchandise was classified as pumps for liquids and parts thereof and assessed with duty at the rate of 12 per centum ad valorem under item 660.90 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States. Plaintiff claims the merchandise is entitled to free entry under the provisions of TSUS item 666.20 as machinery for use in the manufacture of sugar and parts thereof.
The tariff…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kayser & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Swiss Manufactures Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- F. L. Smidth & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Richard Crittall Radiant Heating Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
- Western Cartridge Co. v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
3Cited by15 opinions
- W. R. Filbin & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- American SF Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Mitsubishi International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
- Great Western Sugar Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Hancock Gross, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.