Legal Opinion
Boyce v. City of Scottsdale
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 19, 1988No. 1 CA-CIV 9471PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALAN MATHESON, Judge Pro Tem.
The sole issue considered in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in concluding it had no jurisdiction to review rulings of Scottsdale’s Board of Adjustment.
Appellant Barbara Boyce (Boyce) is the owner of a single-family residence located at 7248 East Wilshire in Scottsdale, Arizona. The property is zoned Rl-7, which requires a minimum front yard setback of 20 feet pursuant to the Scottsdale City Ordinance.
In January, 1986, Boyce applied for and received a building permit from the city to construct an addition of two bathrooms to her house. After…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ballman v. DuffecyIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
- Arch Mineral Corporation v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Campbell v. ChatwinArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Haggard v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- McClanahan v. Cochise CollegeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Grosvenor Holdings, L.C. v. FigueroaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Siegel v. Arizona State Liquor BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Schwartz v. SUPERIOR CT. IN MARICOPA CTY.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Murphy v. Town of Chino ValleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Dioguardi v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.