Dioguardi v. Superior Court
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIDEL, Judge.
This special action concerns the validity of an administrative procedural rule of BO-MEX—the Arizona Board of Medical Examiners—requiring motions for rehearing to be filed within ten days. We hold that the rule violates BOMEX’s statutory mandate to draw its rehearing procedures “as closely as practicable from rule 59, Arizona rules of civil procedure.” See Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“AR.S.”) § 41-1062(B); Ariz.R.Civ.P. 59,16 A.R.S.
I
Petitioner Jeremía Dioguardi, M.D., had engaged in the general practice of medicine in Arizona for thirty-nine years before undergoing…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Southwest Lumber Mills, Inc. v. Employment Security CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Boyce v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- Maldonado v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
3Cited by17 opinions
- Stapert v. Arizona Board of Psychologist ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Little v. TraynorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Arizona State Board of Regents Ex Rel. Arizona State University v. Arizona State Personnel BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- Rosen v. BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS OF STATECourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- State v. CountermanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.