Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Sprigg

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 21, 1927No. Docket No. 5492PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment on an instructed verdict in favor of respondent in an action brought by appellant against respondent, an attorney at law, for alleged negligence in handling a claim placed in his hands for collection. Respondent in his answer denies the alleged negligence and as a separate defense sets up the statute of limitations.

It is charged, in the action and urged by appellant in his brief on appeal the following acts as constituting the negligence complained of: (1) Delay in filing suit on the claim and pressing it to trial and final judgment; (2)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Estate of CasparCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Whitten v. DabneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. In Re Estate of BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Diamond v. WeyerhaeuserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Lally v. KusterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Adams v. PaulCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Siegel v. KranisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  4. Day v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Howe v. Pioneer Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API