Legal Opinion

Lally v. Kuster

California Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1918No. L. A. No. 4129PublishedCited by 41 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant. The action was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for neglect by said respondent as appellant’s attorney in the collection of a note and mortgage. Two questions are presented by the appeal: Was the respondent guilty of neglect, and, if so, was the appellant damaged thereby ? These issues having been determined by the lower court in favor of the respondent, we are to determine whether or not there is substantial evidence to support its findings.

On June 10, 1907, appellant employed respondent to collect an overdue note and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Vooth v. . McEachenNew York Court of Appeals · 1905

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Heyer v. FlaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Smith v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API