State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Ray
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDenNY, J.
When an appeal to the Superior Court is taken from an order entered by the North Carolina Utilities Commission, the review is limited to the record as certified and to the questions of law presented therein. G.S. 62-26.10. There is no provision for additional findings of fact by the judge for the purpose of determining the validity of the order entered by the Commission. Utilities Comm. v. Fox, ante, 553, 78 S.E. 2d 464.
In the case of Utilities Comm. v. Queen City Coach Co., 233 N.C. 119, 63 S.E. 2d 113, Barnhill, J., clearly pointed out that where a franchise carrier of passengers serves…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pue v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Utilities Commission v. . Trucking Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Pue v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Utilities Com. v. . Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Penland v. BIRD COAL COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Baker v. VarserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc. v. Georgia Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- State Ex Rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Carolina Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.