State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Queen City Coach Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBaeNhill, J.
Tbe Legislature, by e. 989, Session Laws 1949, revamped Art. 2 of c. 62 of tbe General Statutes prescribing tbe procedure in bearings before tbe Utilities Commission. Tbe statute, as revised, makes substantial changes in tbe method of procedure before this agency of tbe State.
Likewise tbe law controlling tbe granting of certificates for tbe operation of buses for tbe transportation of passengers was completely revised by c. 1132, Session Laws 1949. Art. 6 of c. 62 of tbe General Statutes was repealed and a new statute, now G.S. c. 62, Art. 6c, was enacted. Tbe provisions of these new statutes…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Utilities Commission v. . Trucking Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Virginia Stage Lines, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
- Consolidated Freightways, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc. v. Georgia Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- FormyDuval v. BunnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.