Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Coach Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided July 19, 1963PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
Carolina, Greyhound and Queen City are common carriers of passengers, their baggage, mail, and light express, in the same vehicle with passengers, by motor vehicle operating over interstate and intrastate franchise routes within the State of North Carolina.
Prior to the institution of the instant proceedings these carriers had, among others, the following franchise routes, respectively:(a). Carolina — (1) Between Raleigh and Charlotte by way of Durham, Burlington, Greensboro, Lexington, Salisbury and Concord, over U. S. Highways 70 and 29; (2) Between Raleigh and Charlotte via Sanford, Biscoe…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mulcahy v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1941
- Utilities Commission v. . Trucking Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Duke Power Co. v. Blue Ridge Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission & Duke Power Co. v. EddlemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Nantahala Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State Ex Rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Carolina Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.