Legal Opinion
Eurodif S.A. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 3, 2005No. Nos. 04-1209, 04-1210PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Circuit Judge.
This interlocutory appeal comes to us from the United States Court of International Trade, which certified four separate questions for appeal to this court. The Ad Hoc Utilities Group (“AHUG”), Eurodif S.A. (“Eurodif’), Compagnie Generate des Matieres Nucleates (“CGMN”) and Coge-ma, Inc. appeal two issues from the Court of International Trade. The United States, USEC, Inc. and the United States Enrichment Corporation (the latter two collectively referred to as “USEC” in this opinion) cross-appeal two issues. We affirm the Court of International Trade’s decision affirming…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Negonsott v. SamuelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Nsk Ltd. And Nsk Corporation v. The United States, and Federal-Mogul Corporation, and the Torrington CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Eurodif S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Eurodif s.a. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Ad Hoc Utilities Group v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Pokarna Engineered Stone Limited v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.