Eurodif s.a. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
PROST, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
More than three months after we decided this case, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in National Cable & Telecommunications Ass’n v. Brand X Internet Services, — U.S. —, 125 S.Ct. 2688, 162 L.Ed.2d 820 (2005). In letters disclosing National Cable as a supplemental authority pursuant to Federal Circuit Rule 28(j), the United States, USEC, Inc. and the United States Enrichment Corporation (collectively, “Petitioners”) contend that the Supreme Court’s reasoning in National Cable strongly supports arguments presented in their petitions for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Nsk Ltd. And Nsk Corporation v. The United States, and Federal-Mogul Corporation, and the Torrington CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Eurodif S.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Eurodif S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Eurodif S.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Eurodif S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Eurodif S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.