Legal Opinion

Ad Hoc Utilities Group v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided June 15, 2009No. Slip Op. 09-56; Court 06-00229PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POGUE, Judge.

The issue before the court is whether the Plaintiff, a group of American utility companies that obtain and use enriched uranium from Russia, has standing to challenge the Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) decision not to terminate its antidumping duty investigation of that uranium. Because the utility companies individually do not each qualify either as producers or importers of the subject uranium and because the companies as a group do not qualify as a trade or business association a majority of the members of which are producers or importers, the court concludes…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Raines v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Market Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ad Hoc Utilities Group v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
  2. Ad Hoc Utilities Group v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
  3. Deacero S.A.P.I. de C v. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
  4. Rebar Trade Action Coal. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API