Legal Opinion
Negonsott v. Samuels
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 24, 1993No. 91-5397PublishedCited by 311 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist
delivered the opinion of the Court. †
The question presented in this case is whether the Kansas Act, 18 U. S. C. §3243, confers jurisdiction on the State of Kansas to prosecute petitioner, a Kickapoo Indian, for the state-law offense of aggravated battery committed against another Indian on an Indian reservation. We hold that it does.
► — I
Petitioner, Emery L. Negonsott, is a member of the Kickapoo Tribe and a resident of the Kickapoo Reservation in Brown County, Kansas. In March 1985, he was arrested by the county sheriff in connection with the shooting of another Indian on the Kickapoo…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bryan v. Itasca CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of the Yakima Indian NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by311 opinions
- McGirt v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Debro S. Abdul-Akbar v. Roderick R. MckelvieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. John Javilo McCullahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Kathy L. Kaul v. Robert T. Stephan, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- In Re Bonner Mall Partnership, Debtor. Bonner Mall Partnership v. U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
306 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.