White v. Harris
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. Waldo M. York, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Britt, C.
Action to enforce an assessment for the expense of constructing a sewer in the city of Los Angeles. A judgment sustaining a demurrer to the complaint was reversed on a former appeal. (White v. Harris, 103 Cal. 528.) After that decision trial was had in the court below, and resulted in favor of defendants. The decision of one of several questions now argued by counsel will suffice for the disposition of the case.
A resolution of intention was passed by the city council on June 20, 1889, declaring the purpose of the council to order the construction of a public sewer along specified…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Perine v. ErzgraberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- White v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by3 opinions
- O. T. Johnson Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Bates v. TwistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Remillard v. Blake & Bilger Co.California Supreme Court · 1915