Legal Opinion

White v. Harris

California Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1894No. 19339PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, J.

Action to foreclose a lien alleged to have been created by an assessment upon the defendant’s lot for the construction of a sewer in front thereof, and along the streets described'in the complaint.

A general demurrer to the complaint was sustained by the court, and upon plaintiff declining to further amend, judgment was given for the defendants, from which judgment plaintiff appeals upon the judgment-roll alone.

*529The only ground urged here upon which the complaint was held tó be insufficient by the court below is, that it failed to allege the formation of a district upon which should be…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gist v. Rackliffe-Gibson Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Rauer v. LoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. White v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API