Legal Opinion

Bates v. Twist

California Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1902No. S.F. No. 2286PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Action upon a street assessment in San Francisco. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendants have appealed, presenting their appeal upon the judgment-roll with a bill of exceptions.

The board of supervisors passed a resolution of its intention to order “That N Street South, between Fifteenth Avenue South and the southwesterly line of Nineteenth Avenue South, be graded to the official line and grade; that redwood curbs and rock gutters be laid thereon, and that the roadways and sidewalks of said portion of N Street South be macadamized,” and subsequently- passed a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Los Angeles Lighting Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Treanor v. HoughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Mahoney v. BravermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. White v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Southwick v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Hutton v. NewhouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Remillard v. Blake & Bilger Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Collins v. City of PhœnixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  5. San Francisco Paving Co. v. EganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API