Legal Opinion

Abella v. Rubino

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 12, 1995No. 18-12283PublishedCited by 156 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Abella, a federal prisoner convicted of various narcotic offenses, filed this pro se Bivens 1 action. His amended complaint named numerous defendants, including two federal district judges, an assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Customs and DEA officials, U.S. Marshals, three federal court reporters, a judicial law clerk, a secretary, and several of Abella’s co-defendants and their respective attorneys. Abella claimed that the defendants knowingly and willfully conspired to convict him falsely by fabricating testimony and other evidence against him, in violation of his Fifth, Sixth and Eighth…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by156 opinions

  1. Larry Bolin, Kenneth David Pealock v. Richard W. StoryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  2. Olee Wonzo Robinson v. Mark C. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  3. Gerald W. Clemente v. Troy AllenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  4. Ruff v. RunyonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. Robert L. Williams v. Leo C. HillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996

151 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API