Legal Opinion
Durant v. Chater
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided October 24, 1995No. Civ. A. 95-10545PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, District Judge.
The plaintiff Martha Durant (“Durant”) seeks judicial review of the final decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“the Secretary”) denying her application for Supplemental Security Income benefits based on disability (“SSI benefits”). Durant argues the Secretary’s decision was legally erroneous and not based upon substantial evidence. Accordingly, Durant asks this Court either to reverse and set aside the defendant’s decision, or to remand her claim for reconsideration. Durant also seeks reasonable attorney fees and costs.
I. PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Maria S. Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Wells v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Musto v. HalterDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Bazile v. ApfelDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
- Guyton v. ApfelDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Coggon v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.