Legal Opinion
Guyton v. Apfel
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided August 31, 1998No. Civil Action 97-10704-WGYPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, District Judge.
This is an action under Sections 205(g) and 1361(c)(3) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(e)(3). The plaintiff, Raji Guyton (“Guyton”), seeks judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“the Commissioner”) denying Guyton’s applications for Social Security Childhood Disability Insurance Benefits (“CDI benefits”), 42 U.S.C. § 423, and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI benefits”), 42 U.S.C. § 1381(a).
Guyton argues that the Commissioner’s decision is legally erroneous and not based…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Victor J. Irlanda Ortiz v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Maria S. Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Nicasio RODRIGUEZ PAGAN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Wells v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Musto v. HalterDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Bazile v. ApfelDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
- Dube v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2011
- Coggon v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.