Legal Opinion
District of Columbia v. Kora & Williams Corp.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 30, 1999No. 97-AA-98PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
In this dispute over the performance of a major government contract, the District of Columbia challenges the decision of the District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board (“the Board”) converting the default termination of Kora & Williams Corporation to a termination for the convenience of the District of Columbia and awarding Kora & Williams and its surety (hereafter collectively “K & W”) total costs of $12,-410,991 plus interest at four percent per annum. The District primarily attacks two procedural rulings of the Board by which, at the entitlement hearing, 1 it…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Kalvar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- College Point Boat Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hill v. Medlantic Health Care GroupDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Caulfield v. StarkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Vizion One, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Health Care FinanceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Insurance Co. of North America v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.