Legal Opinion
United Partition Systems, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 19, 2009No. 03-1242CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
United Partition Systems, Inc. (“United”) manufactures and installs prefabricated modular buildings primarily for indoor use, and United held a Multiple Award Schedule Contract with the General Services Administration (“GSA”) for provision of those buildings to federal agencies. The Department of the Air Force (“Air Force”), 56th Contracting Squadron at Luke Air Force Base (“Luke AFB”), contracted with United to install a prefabricated building inside one of their large warehouses. United undertook to per*77form under the contract and substantially completed…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- John Reiner & Company, Individually and to the Use of Kurz & Root Company (Incorporated) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- College Point Boat Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Matthews v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- D. Joseph Devito, Receiver for Seaview Electric Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United Partition Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Ulysses, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- AEY, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- TRG Construction Inc. v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Old Colony Construction, LLC v. SouthingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.