Robson v. Quentin E. Cadd Agency
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Harsha, Judge.
{¶ 1} Walter Robson and Debi Oliver 1 appeal the trial court’s decision entering summary judgment in favor of the Quentin E. Cadd Agency on their negligent- procurement claim. They contend that genuine issues of material fact remain regarding whether Cadd breached its duty to provide the uninsured-/underinsured-motorists (“UM/UIM”) coverage that Oliver allegedly requested. Oliver stated that she requested a policy with “full coverage,” which she assumed would include UM/UIM coverage. However, Cadd’s agent stated that Oliver requested her to remove UM/UIM coverage from the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Bostic v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Stephens v. Worden Insurance Agency, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Davis v. Byers VolvoOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Graff v. Robert M. Swendra Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Shafer v. Newman Ins. AgencyOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Nat'l Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2005-3 v. Dunlap, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Ross County2018
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.