Legal Opinion

Dayley v. State, Department of Health & Welfare

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1987No. 16374PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALDSON, Justice.

This appeal involves the termination of a parent-child relationship. Appellant’s main contentions are that: (1) his due process rights were violated because the termination petition failed to specifically state the statutory grounds upon which termination was sought; (2) the decision to terminate his parental rights was not supported by legally sufficient evidence, and (3) the magistrate erred by not addressing the question of appointing counsel and a guardian ad litem on behalf of the child Alena. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the magistrate’s decision.

Alena…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Collord v. CooleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Blankenship v. BrookshierIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State Ex Rel. Child v. ClouseIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Rhodes v. State, Dept. of Health and WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Roe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Doe v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Tanner v. State, Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. In Re Adoption of DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Doe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API