Dayley v. State, Department of Health & Welfare
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DONALDSON, Justice.
This appeal involves the termination of a parent-child relationship. Appellant’s main contentions are that: (1) his due process rights were violated because the termination petition failed to specifically state the statutory grounds upon which termination was sought; (2) the decision to terminate his parental rights was not supported by legally sufficient evidence, and (3) the magistrate erred by not addressing the question of appointing counsel and a guardian ad litem on behalf of the child Alena. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the magistrate’s decision.
Alena…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Collord v. CooleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- Blankenship v. BrookshierIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Child v. ClouseIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
- Rhodes v. State, Dept. of Health and WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
3Cited by17 opinions
- Roe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
- Doe v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Tanner v. State, Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re Adoption of DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
- Doe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.