Legal Opinion

State, Department of Health & Welfare v. Cheatwood

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1985No. 15344PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

We are asked to decide whether a parent-child relationship should be terminated for parental neglect. We approach this question mindful of a remark attributed to Luther Burbank, the famous botanist: “If we had paid no more attention to our plants than we have to our children, we would now be living in a jungle of weeds.” Burbank’s confession pointedly reminds us that children do not grow into healthy adults by accident. They need attentive care.

In this ease, the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare filed a termination petition in the interest of Justin Lee Cheat-wood, a boy…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Rhodes v. State, Dept. of Health and WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tanner v. State, Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Re: Thermination of Parental Rights (mother)Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Doe v. RoeIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API