Legal Opinion

Stang v. Caragianis

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 3, 1988No. 60,768PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland,

J.: This is an action seeking recovery for injuries sustained by plaintiff Susan Stang in an automobile accident. Following a jury trial, the district court sustained a motion for a directed verdict limiting plaintiff s recovery to 90 percent of her pecuniary losses on the basis of the jury’s determination of comparative fault and its answer to a special question. The district court held that plaintiff had failed to meet the threshold requirements of K.S.A. 40-3117. Plaintiff appeals from this determination.

Plaintiff was a passenger in an…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Pinnick v. ClearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  2. Manzanares v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. Wolf v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident AssociationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  4. Hoard v. Shawnee Mission Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  5. Domann v. PenceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Oswin v. ShawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. Cott v. Peppermint Twist Management Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  3. Hetzel v. ClarkinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  4. Lesniak v. County of BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  5. Brown v. PuenteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API