Stang v. Caragianis
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
McFarland,
J.: This is an action seeking recovery for injuries sustained by plaintiff Susan Stang in an automobile accident. Following a jury trial, the district court sustained a motion for a directed verdict limiting plaintiff s recovery to 90 percent of her pecuniary losses on the basis of the jury’s determination of comparative fault and its answer to a special question. The district court held that plaintiff had failed to meet the threshold requirements of K.S.A. 40-3117. Plaintiff appeals from this determination.
Plaintiff was a passenger in an…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pinnick v. ClearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Manzanares v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Wolf v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident AssociationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
- Hoard v. Shawnee Mission Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Domann v. PenceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Oswin v. ShawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Cott v. Peppermint Twist Management Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- Hetzel v. ClarkinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
- Lesniak v. County of BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Brown v. PuenteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.