Legal Opinion

Hetzel v. Clarkin

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 14, 1989No. 62,593PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Six, J.:

This case presents a first impression review of the Kansas Insurance Guaranty Association Act (the Guaranty Act), K.S.A. 40-2901 et seq. The context of our initial interpretation involves the relationship of uninsured motorist coverage held by a plaintiff asserting a personal injury claim against a defendant whose insurance carrier is insolvent.

Plaintiff Mary Hetzel appeals from the trial court’s dismissal with prejudice of her damage action against defendant Charles Clarkin. Hetzel’s claim arose out of injuries she sustained in an automobile…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lucas v. Illinois Insurance Guaranty FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  2. Hickerson v. Protective Nat. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  3. Prutzman v. ArmstrongWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Billeaudeau v. LemoineSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  5. Febert v. Upland Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Oglesby v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. DeVane v. KennedyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. A.W. Chesterton Co. v. Massachusetts Insurers Insolvency FundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  4. Brennan v. Kansas Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  5. Hasemann v. WhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1997

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API