Legal Opinion

Manzanares v. Bell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 7, 1974No. 47,412PublishedCited by 140 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, C. J.:

This appeal involves the constitutionality of legislation commonly known as the Kansas No-Fault Insurance Act.

In 1973, the Kansas Legislature enacted Substitute for House Bill 1129 which is published as Chapter 198 of the 1973 Session Laws (L. 1973, Ch. 198), and is incorporated in the Kansas Statutes Annotated as K. S. A. 40-3101 through 40-3121. The Act was defined by Section 1 as the “Kansas Automobile Injury Reparations Act” and became effective January 1, 1974. Because of the posture of this case on appeal and events which occurred…

2Cases cited111 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by140 opinions

  1. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Bair v. PeckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  3. Brown v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. Gentile v. AltermattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  5. Samsel v. Wheeler Transport Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990

135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API