Legal Opinion

Oswin v. Shaw

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 30, 1992PublishedCited by 143 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

CLIFFORD, J.

This appeal focuses on the procedure and the standard for determining compliance with the verbal threshold, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8a, set forth in New Jersey’s no-fault automobile-insurance statute, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to -35. Plaintiff sustained soft-tissue injuries in an automobile accident. She sued defendant in the Law Division to recover noneconomic losses. The trial court entered summary judgment for defendant on the ground that the statute does not permit recovery of noneconomic losses due to soft-tissue injuries. The Appellate Division…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  3. Shaw v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Scheer v. KoubekNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. DiFranco v. PickardMichigan Supreme Court · 1986

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by143 opinions

  1. DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. Hisenaj v. KuehnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  3. Young v. Schering Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  4. Roig v. KelseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  5. Caviglia v. Royal Tours of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004

138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API