Legal Opinion
Silver v. Lansburgh & Bro.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 25, 1940No. 7507PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGroner, C. J.
The one question for decision is whether a corporation in the District of Columbia may lawfully employ a licensed practitioner of optometry to perform op-tometrical services for those to whom the corporation offers such services.
Appellants are licensed and registered optometrists. They brought this suit in behalf of themselves and others similarly situated against appellees, Lansburgh & Bro., a corporation conducting a large department store in Washington City, and Buhl Optical Company, a District corporation organized to operate and own optical and optometrical stores, to restrain them from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dvorine v. Castelberg Jewelry Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
- Ezell v. RitholzSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
- United States v. American Medical Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Georgia State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. Friedmans' Jewelers Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Gus Blass Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rockett v. Texas State Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- MacK v. SaarsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Stacy Evers v. Herbert A. Buxbaum, T/a Rubin Optical Company, and Dr. Joseph FriedmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Fields v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- Lee Optical Co. of Alabama, Inc. v. State Board of OptometrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.