Lee Optical Co. of Alabama, Inc. v. State Board of Optometry
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
HARWOOD, Justice.
The Alabama Board of Optometry (hereinafter referred to as the Board) filed a bill against Lee Optical Company of Alabama (hereinafter referred to as Lee). Originally thirteen optometrists and one physician were also named as co-respondents along with Lee, but these individual respondents were eliminated on order of the court.
The bill sought to enjoin Lee “from the unlawful practice of optometry, either directly or indirectly in the State of Alabama,” and from employing by any means or arrangement registered (i. e., licensed) optometrists or . physicians, surgeons, or…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Dvorine v. Castelberg Jewelry Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
- State v. Kindy Optical Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- MacK v. SaarsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Georgia State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. Friedmans' Jewelers Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Gus Blass Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kirkland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- Eagerton v. Terra Resources, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Karrh v. BD. OF CONTROL OF RETIREMENTSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Salvati v. DaleDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.