Legal Opinion

Mangiante v. Niemiec

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 30, 2004No. AC 23789PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

The principal issues in this appeal are whether (1) the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (act), General Statutes §§ 45a-557 through 45a-560b, establishes a fiduciary relationship between a custodian and a minor and whether (2) the trial court improperly concluded that the defendant breached her fiduciary duty by using custodial funds to satisfy her child support obligations. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

*279The relevant facts are as follows. In 1996, pursuant to the act, the defendant, Theresa Mangiante Niemiec, established a savings account in the amount of $3920 for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  2. Hi-Ho Tower, Inc. v. Com-Tronics, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & KotkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. Spector v. KonoverConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  5. Johnson v. MazzaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chioffi v. MartinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. NRT New England, Inc. v. MoncureMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  3. Flannery v. Singer Asset Finance Co., LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014
  4. Matter of McMillanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API