Fagerlie v. New York Life Insurance
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
The plaintiff alleges two causes of action. The first is based upon a life insurance policy dated August 17th, 1920, for $5,000 in case of death, which provides that if the insured becomes wholly and permanently disabled, the company will pay as disability benefits annually, one tenth of the face of the policy, and also waive certain premium payments, This will be referred to as the first policy. Under the terms of this policy total and permanent disability is defined as disability by which insured “has become wholly disabled by bodily injury or disease, so that he is and will be presumably…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lobdill v. Laboring Men's Mutual Aid Ass'n of ChatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Fitzgerald v. Globe Indemnity Co. of New YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Barker v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. DickMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Booth v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Tyrrell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
- Rezendes v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Bulluck v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- McHorse v. Portland General Electric CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Kundiger v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.