Legal Opinion
Misskelley v. Home Life Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided December 13, 1933PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClakksoN, J.
At tbe close of plaintiff’s evidence and at tbe close of all tbe evidence defendant made motions for judgment as in case of nonsuit. O. S., 567. The court below overruled these motions, and in this we can see no error.
Plaintiff testified, in part: “I made application to the Home Life Insurance Company of New York for a policy of insurance on 31 July, 1929. After making application for the policy, on 4 August, 1929, the company sent me to Dr. James E. Eogers to be exainined. I visited Dr. Eogers’ office for this examination. He stripped me to my waist and tested my heart and lungs and my blood…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gerringer v. North Carolina Home InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- McCutchen v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
- Thigpen v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Bulluck v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Continental Casualty Co. v. WynneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Gorham v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Williams v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Hurwit v. Prudential I. Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Leonard v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Edwards v. National Council, Junior Order United American Mechanics Beneficiary DegreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.