Legal Opinion

Leonard v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 13, 1937PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeKSON, J.

The defendant introduced no evidence and at the close of plaintiff’s evidence made a motion in the court below for judgment as in case of nonsuit. The court below overruled the motion, and in this we can see no error. The evidence which makes for plaintiff’s claim, or tends to support his cause of action, is to be taken in its most favorable light for the plaintiff, and he is entitled to the benefit of every reasonable intendent upon the evidence, and every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom.

In Bulluck v. Ins. Co., 200 N. C., 642, Brogden, J., after citing many authorities, says, at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Britt v. Carolina Northern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Bulluck v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Misskelley v. Home Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Smith v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Fore v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bowler v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of NYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  2. Jones v. SchafferSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Patrick v. . TreadwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Edwards v. National Council, Junior Order United American Mechanics Beneficiary DegreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Medlin v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API