Legal Opinion
United States v. Vanzandt
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided December 20, 1982No. 40,408; CM 439773PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
EVERETT, Chief Judge:
Tried by general court-martial, the accused was convicted, despite his pleas, of possession and sale of heroin, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. The approved sentence extends to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for 1 year, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to private (E-l). After the United States Army Court of Military Review affirmed the findings and sentence, we granted review on these three issues:
WHETHER THE APPELLANT WAS UNLAWFULLY ENTRAPPED BY AN AGENT OF THE…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States of America, in No. 81-1020 v. Jannotti, Harry P. United States of America, in No. 81-1021 v. Schwartz, George XCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- United States v. ClarkUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
- United States v. BellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
- United States v. NewmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. HowellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.