Legal Opinion
United States v. Bell
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided September 30, 1993No. 66,143; CMR No. 8903667PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant has been convicted in a contested trial of two specifications of wrongful distribution of crack cocaine. He has also been convicted of wrongful use of crack cocaine. The Court of Military Review affirmed these findings. We granted review to consider two issues. 36 MJ 204.
The Court upholds the decision below as to the distribution specifications for the reasons stated in the opinion by Judge COX, joined by Chief Judge SULLIVAN and Judge CRAWFORD; and in the separate opinion by Judge WISS. For the reasons stated in Judge GIERKE’s opinion, he dissents from upholding the decision below…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
- United States v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. LemasterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
- United States v. BrownU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994
- United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.